A fixed compute budget still leaves one big choice.

Should FLOPs buy more parameters or more training tokens? Explore compute-optimal scaling, data quality, and the cost of overtraining one side of the model-data balance.

Loss versus allocation

Parameters0B
Training tokens0B
Tokens/parameter0
Relative loss0

Power laws turn budget allocation into an optimization problem.

Parameters and data remove different bottlenecks.

Larger models improve representational capacity. More tokens improve estimation and coverage. A fixed compute budget cannot maximize both independently.

Compute couples N and D.

Transformer training compute is approximately proportional to parameter count times training tokens.

C ≈ 6ND

Quality changes effective tokens.

Cleaner, more relevant data can contribute more learning signal per raw token.

Overtraining can still be practical.

Training beyond the compute-optimal token count may produce a smaller model that is cheaper to serve.

Scaling curves are empirical.

Architecture, tokenizer, data mixture, optimizer, and evaluation distribution all affect fitted exponents.

Primary reading

Scaling Laws for Neural Language ModelsTraining Compute-Optimal Large Language ModelsScaling Data-Constrained Language Models