The five-line template
- Decision: what the agent wants to do.
- Reason: why it stopped now.
- Evidence: the shortest trustworthy proof.
- Risk: what could go wrong.
- Reply: approve, edit, reject, or inspect.
A personal AI agent should not text a vague "approve?" when a task gets risky. It should send a compact brief with the proposed action, evidence, uncertainty, consent impact, and a safe next button.
The operator needs enough context to act, and a path to inspect more when the agent is touching accounts, money, identity, or public work.
Operators should know the requested decision before reading the supporting detail.
Missing context is not a failure. Hiding it is the failure that causes bad approvals.
The reply should become part of the task record for retries, resumes, and future audits.
Super's personal agent direction is naturally aligned with text approval loops. Builders can start at getsupers.com, then map escalation and approval flows through the text-message AI assistant use case.
For browser-based work, use artifacts from a computer-use cache. For publishing work, include the planned path and rollback note from the AI agent website-building workflow.
The brief is not a transcript. It is a decision object. It should help a busy operator approve with confidence or pause with precision.
Summarize what the agent was trying to accomplish, where it is now, and which part cannot proceed without human judgment.
Use screenshots, source links, field diffs, or cached browser artifacts. The operator should not need to reconstruct the run from memory.
Give the user a clean approve option, but also make edit and inspect natural. This prevents false confidence from turning into automatic yes.
Use these checks before your agent asks a human to make a decision from a message notification.
Short enough to read in one phone glance, with a link to inspect evidence when the decision has material risk.
The NIST AI Risk Management Framework is useful for risk governance, while the OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications is useful for tool-use and excessive-agency risks.
No. Include screenshots or cached evidence when the agent made a browser decision, changed a record, compared options, or prepared an externally visible action.
Measure fewer repeated questions, fewer reversals, and faster safe approvals. Speed alone is not enough.